GIS I Lab 4: Final Project
Introduction:
The goal of this final project is to find suitable locations for new campgrounds in Bayfield County, Wisconsin. This was inspired by the unique and beautiful forested and lakeshore environments that lend themselves to recreational camping and tourism, and are underutilized in the opinion of this author. This project will use multiple tools, including buffer, intersect, erase, select and union tool, displaying proficiency with ArcMap.
The intended audience for this project is either an individual, company, or government organization looking to establish a new campground in Bayfield County. This information would prove useful in deciding a location for said campground.
Research Question: What locations in Bayfield County, WI are most suitable for use as a campground?
Data Sources:
The data required for this project includes maps of the county including bodies of water, major roads, and forested land from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) and U.S. Census data that was acquired from the UW - Eau Claire Geography Department server (located at geogsql.uwec.edu via a virtual private network, instructions located here), coordinates for established campgrounds from the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest website, and also the Bayfield County website.
One concern regarding the data is that not all coordinates for privately owned campgrounds were readily available online, and thus are not represented in this project. This is an acknowledged oversight, but deemed acceptable considering the scope of the project (the assigned "simple question" to be answered). Secondly, the use of state data on bodies of water was so thorough that it includes many bodies of water that are not realistically practical as sites for campgrounds, however this can be compensated for.
Methods:
In order to answer to answer this research question, multiple geospatial analytic techniques were used.
Queries were used to narrow down the scope of the data being analyzed, and the state-wide datasets were clipped down to include only the target county. Buffers were used to account for desired proximity to resources like major roads and lakes, while buffers combined with the erase tool ensured there was an appropriate distance from other, already established campsites.
First, the county boundaries were queried to just Bayfield county, and that was used to clip the National Forest and Major Roads layers to the county in question. The Bayfield County Forests were connected to the National Forest layer using a union to account for all of the forested land in the county. The Water Bodies layer was narrowed to Perennial Lakes and Ponds using a the select tool, and then a query was used to select just the lakes. Then buffers were applied to the Bayfield County Major Roads, Lakes, and Established Campgrounds at distances of 5 miles, 2 miles, and 2 miles, respectively. The intersect tool was used to identify land that is within the buffers of major roads and bodies of water and lies on forested land. Then the erase tool was used to remove any land within the buffer of previously established campgrounds, giving the result of land for potential new campgrounds.
The data flow chart above shows the procedure undertaken to determine the locations most appropriate for campgrounds that are not yet in use as campgrounds.
Figure 2. Map showing all of the buffers, major roads, National and County Forests, and lakes within the County.
Results:
Below is Figure 3, which shows the final product of this project: an aesthetically pleasing and useful map that shows the locations for new campgrounds. It is likely that there are two especially good locations for campgrounds: the northernmost plot of land is close in proximity to the lakeshore as well as bring within the forested land, and the southwestern sections of land are far enough from competing camps that it could be a very successful location.
Figure 3. The final product showing the possible locations for campgrounds.
Evaluation:
I believe that this project, while challenging in its own right, is possibly the most useful because each student can find their own value. I think that it was intimidating to begin, because there was less direction than other labs, but once started, I found it more easy to actually complete.
If I were to repeat the project, I would have incorporated the lakeshore as a body of water to keep proximity to. Even though the forests do not come close to the lakeshore, it is a beautiful location on its own. I would go about this by including Lake Superior as a separate layer and having two resulting land types: potential forest camping sites, and shoreline camping sites.
The greatest challenge that I faced was getting the geographical coordinates for the campsites that already exist. I had to enter the x, y coordinates and then create a new feature class and edit it to add the points because there was not a table that I could easily import into ArcMap.





